Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 MASS 153 - Amy v. Manning

Amy v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 1919
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1919

5 state decisions

301887189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stone v. State of South Carolina · Gibson v. Bruce · Carson v. · Babbitt v. Clark · Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Speck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in case said motion should not be allowed and in case said plea should not be sustained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.