Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 Md. App. 643 - State v. Miller

144 Md. App. 643 - State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Matlock · Illinois v. Rodriguez · Florida v. Jimeno · Stoner v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Common authority is, of course, not to be implied from the mere property interest a third party has in the property. The authority which justifies the third-party consent ... rests on mutual use of the property by persons generally having joint access or control for most purposes, so that it is reasonable to recognize that any of the co-inhabitants has the right to permit the inspection, in his own right and that the others have assumed the risk that one of their number might permit the common area to be searched.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.