Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 MDAPP 77 - Cross v. State

Cross v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3144 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Barber v. Page · Mattox v. United States · Texas v. Louisiana · Webster v. Reproductive Health Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Definition of unavailability. “Unavailability as a witness” includes situations in which the declarant: (5) is absent from the hearing and the proponent of the statement has been unable to procure the declarant’s attendance ... by process or other reasonable means.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.