Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

144 Mich. 23

Gray v. Eldred

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1906

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1906-04-30

Bill by Thomas Gray, supervisor, and John Dunn, highway commissioner, of Isabella township, against Sherman D. Eldred, county drain commissioner, and the Joliet Bridge & Iron Company to enjoin the closing of a contract for the purchase of certain bridges. From an order overruling certain legal objections to complainants’ right to maintain the bill raised by the answers and determined before proofs were taken, defendants appeal.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1913

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Order set aside and case remanded for hearing upon proofs · Decided 1906-04-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Grant, J.

¶1(after stating the facts). No such practice is known to the courts of this State. When defendants in a chancery suit have answered, and in their answer have inserted the usual demurrer clause, and replications have been filed, the case must go to a hearing upon the issues joined and a final decree rendered. It is neither proper nor good practice to permit parties to then take advantage of a demurrer and bring the case into this court by piecemeal. The result would be two trials, and possibly two appeals to this court to determine the issues, and great delay. We cannot sanction such a practice, even at the request of the parties litigant.

¶2Without determining the questions raised, the order of the court will be set aside, and the case remanded for hearing upon proofs, should the parties desire to introduce any. No costs will be allowed.

McAlvay, Montgomery, Hooker, and Moore, JJ., concurred.
/144/mich/23 · .json · Public domain