Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 MISC 149 - Agar v. Orda

Agar v. Orda’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
December 1971
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 1971

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

8019321940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on First Nat Bank of Boston v. State of Maine · Dustan v. . McAndrew · Van Brocklen v. . Smeallie · Millard v. Green · Ackerman v. . Rubens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiff contends that title to 200 shares of stock passed to the defendant at the moment the seller received stock sufficient to meet its obligation to the defendant. No weight can be given to this contention,.in view of the provision of the .Uniform Stock Transfer Act that title to shares of stock can be transferred only by delivery. Personal Property Law, § 162, as added by Laws 1913, 0.600 * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * The decision in Friedman v. Bachmann purports to lay down a definite rule on a subject of widespread commercial interest. Although the historical correctness of this rule may be challenged, it reflects a practical rather than a legalistic conception of the status of shares of corporate stock, and tends to conform to the needs of modern business practice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.