Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

144 Misc. 2

Connelly v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1932-06-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1934

1 state decisions

Relies on Van Clief v. . Van Vechten

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-06-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Peb Cubiam.

¶1Notwithstanding the $3,000 constitutional and statutory hmitation applicable to the City Court in an action of this character, as the summons was served before the service of the complaint jurisdiction may be sustained upon the authority of Van Clief v. Van Vechten (130 N. Y. 571).

¶2The distinction between a case where plaintiff’s “ claim ” exceeds the jurisdiction and one where it is enacted that jurisdiction attaches where the complaint demands judgment for an amount not exceeding a specified sum, is not convincing, for if an excessive claim may be amended to save jurisdiction, it would seem that a demand in a complaint may be likewise reduced to comply with jurisdictional requirements.

¶3Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

¶4All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Fbankenthalee, JJ.

/144/misc/2 · .json · Public domain