Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 N.C. App. 131 - Doe v. Jenkins

144 N.C. App. 131 - Doe v. Jenkins’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Collingwood v. GEN. ELEC. R. EST. EQUIT. · Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire Insurance · Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc. · 110 N.C. App. 707 - Messick v. Catawba County, NC · Messick v. CATAWBA COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A county may contract to insure itself and any of its officers, agents, or employees against liability for wrongful death or negligent or intentional damage to person or property or against absolute liability for damage to person or property caused by an act or omission of the county or of any of its officers, agents, or employees when acting within the scope of their authority and the course of their employment. The board of commissioners shall determine what liabilities and what officers, agents, and employees shall be covered by any insurance purchased pursuant to this subsection. Purchase of insurance pursuant to this subsection waives the county’s governmental immunity, to the extent of insurance coverage, for any act or omission occurring in the exercise of a governmental function. ... (b) If a county has waived its governmental immunity pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, any person, or if he dies, his personal representative, sustaining damages as a result of an act or omission of the county or any of its officers, agents, or employees, occurring in the exercise of a governmental function, may sue the county for recovery of damages. To the extent of the coverage of insurance purchased pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, governmental immunity may not be a defense to the action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.