Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 N.C. App. 187 - In Re Eckard

144 N.C. App. 187 - In Re Eckard’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Moore v. City of East Cleveland · Matter of Ballard · 127 N.C. App. 505 - Matter of Helms · Matter of Shue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Such efforts clearly would be futile or would be inconsistent with the juvenile’s health, safety, and need for a safe, permanent home within a reasonable period of time; (2) A court of competent jurisdiction has determined that the parent has subjected the child to aggravated circumstances as defined in G.S. 7B-101; (3) A court of competent jurisdiction has terminated involuntarily the parental rights of the parent to another child of the parent; or (4) A court of competent jurisdiction has determined that: the parent has committed murder or voluntary' manslaughter of another child of the parent; has aided, abetted, attempted, conspired, or solicited to commit murder or voluntary manslaughter of the child or another child of the parent; or has committed a felony assault resulting in serious bodily injury to the child or another child of the parent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “All dispositional orders of the trial court in abuse, neglect and dependency hearings must contain findings of fact based upon the credible evidence presented at the hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) Respondent has had relationships with five different men in the two years preceding the hearing, (2) respondent is “gullible and naive,” (3) respondent would require “ongoing assistance from professionals for a number of reasons,” with “no guarantees that she would [not] form questionable relationships, which could put her daughter at risk,” (4) respondent has an I.Q. “which ranks in the extremely low range,” (5) “[the juvenile] is too bonded to her current placement [with her foster parents] to risk her young and fragile well-being at this time” and (6) respondent did not do more to protect [the juvenile].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.