Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 N.C. App. 574 - State v. Crenshaw

144 N.C. App. 574 - State v. Crenshaw’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · In re Reidt · Pierce v. United States · In re Kost

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the State seeks to rely upon [a] defendant's consent to support the validity of a search, it has the burden of proving that the consent was voluntary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]ndividually, any of the factors cited [in a Terry stop] might not justify a search, but one cannot piecemeal this analysis”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that defendant's consent to the search was freely given, and was not the product of coercion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.