State v. Jack’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · United States v. Cronic · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“identify specific acts or omissions that are outside the `wide range of reasonable professional assistance' and . . . show prejudice by demonstrating `a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“State v. Norman, 151 N.J. 5, 37 , 697 A. 2d 511 (1997) (quoting Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. at 2065 , 80 L.Ed.2d at 694 ). Further,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when the level of counsel's participation makes the idea of a fair trial a nullity, prejudice need not be shown, it is presumed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.