Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 N.J. Super. 444 - Stein v. Fellerman

144 N.J. Super. 444 - Stein v. Fellerman’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2001 · most notably Maitlen v. Maitlen (1981), MacDonald v. MacDonald (In Re MacDonald) (1986)

5 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

1701976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kathleen Poolman v. William F. Poolman, Bankrupt · 116 N.J. Super. 546 - Schiff v. Schiff · Jones v. Tyson · Berkowitz v. Berkowitz · Russo v. Newark Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If after the judgment of divorce the wife shall remarry, the court shall not make any order as to the alimony of such wife except that upon application of the former husband, on notice and on proof of the marriage of the former wife after the judgment of divorce, the court shall modify any order or judgment as to the alimony of the former wife by vacating and annulling any and all provisions in any such order or judgment, or both, directing the payment of money for the support of the former wife.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... [t]he public policy of this State, expressed in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-25, that a divorced husband should not be forced to support a former wife after she has remarried another.... [at 454]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.