State v. STEPHEN F.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably 1 N.M. Ct. App. 535 - State v. Tollardo (2012), State v. Silva (2008)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Chambers v. Mississippi · Rock v. Arkansas · Olden v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether there is a clear showing that the complainant committed the prior acts; (2) whether the circumstances of the prior acts closely resemble those of the present case; (3) whether the prior acts are clearly relevant to a material issue, such as identity, intent, or bias; (4) whether the evidence is necessary to the defendant’s case; [and] (5) whether the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Montoya“[a] defendant's right to confront and to cross-examine is not absolute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Silva
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.