State v. Funderburg’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably State v. Leyva (2011), State v. Hubble (2009)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Delaware v. Prouse · New York v. Belton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen considering whether a detention is reasonably related in scope to the circumstances of the case, a reviewing court must consider whether the officer’s subsequent actions were fairly responsive to the emerging tableau — the circumstances originally warranting the stop, informed by what occurred, and what the officer learned, as the stop progressed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“New Mexico courts follow the two-part test set forth in Terry to analyze the reasonableness of an officer’s actions during a traffic stop. State v. Duran, 2005-NMSC-034, ¶ 23 , 138 N.M. 414 , 120 P.3d 836 . Under Terry, “the officer’s action [must have been] justified at its inception, and ... it [must have been] reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” Terry, 392 U.S. at 19-20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ; accord Duran, 2005-NMSC-034, ¶ 23 , 138 N.M. 414 , 120 P.3d 836 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Harrison“The term reasonable suspicion does not lend itself to a neat set of legal rules. The United States Supreme Court has described reasonable suspicion simply as a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the person stopped of criminal activity. We agree that reasonable suspicion is a commonsense, nontechnical conception} ], which requires that officers articulate a reason, beyond a mere hunch, for their belief that an individual has committed a criminal act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Alderete
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.