Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 N.M. 371 - State v. Rowell

State v. Rowell’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
2
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

91 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Leyva (2011), State v. Saiz (2008)

91 state decisions

670200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Weeks v. United States · New York v. Belton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although our inquiry is necessarily fact-based it compels a careful balancing of constitutional values, which extends beyond fact-finding, to shape the parameters of police conduct by placing the constitutional requirement of reasonableness in factual context.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “knew that there was at least one firearm in the car, he was justified in searching every place inside where a weapon and its explosive ammunition might be located. [The officer] was not obligated to stop his search as soon as he found the first weapon. Finding an additional loaded firearm, other weapons and spare ammunition only served to enhance the good cause the officer had to continue his search of both the passenger compartment and the trunk to make sure he would secure the entire arsenal of weapons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Our search incident to arrest exception is a rule of reasonableness anchored in the specific circumstances facing an officer [and d]eeiding whether there is a reasonable threat of a suspect being able to gain access to an area to get a weapon or evidence is the kind of decision officers are trained to make.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.