Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 N.M. 574 - State v. Layne

State v. Layne’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2022

21 state decisions

170200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Rojo · State v. Sosa · State v. Forbes · State v. Cherryhomes · State v. Desnoyers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An abuse of discretion occurs when the ruling is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances of the case. We cannot say the trial court abused its discretion by its ruling unless we can characterize it as clearly untenable or not justified by reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The very essence of discretion is that there will be reasons for the district court to rule either way on an issue, and whatever way the district court rules will not be an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.