144 Ohio App. 3d 116 - State v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

23 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Once it is established that the offender has committed a sexually oriented offense, the key to any sexual-offender-classification hearing is determining whether the offender is likely to reoffend in the future.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Archer, Unpublished Decision (3-30-2007) · State v. Jones, Unpublished Decision (11-17-2004)

2. “and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually oriented offenses.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Messer, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2004) · State v. Jones, Unpublished Decision (11-17-2004)

3. “The standard of review for appeals in civil cases challenging manifest weight or the sufficiency of the evidence is that: `judgments supported by some competent, credible evidence going to all the essential elements of the case will not be reversed by a reviewing court as being against the manifest weight of the evidence.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Grandbouche, Unpublished Decision (12-17-2004)