Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 Ohio App. 3d 168 - State v. Abelt

144 Ohio App. 3d 168 - State v. Abelt’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ake v. Oklahoma · State v. Cook · State v. Mason · State v. Broom · State v. Eppinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Undeveloped assertions that the proposed assistance would be useful to the defense are patently inadequate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “absent this expert assessment of [the defendant's] current condition * * * the State is simply asking for a determination based on a generalized fear and/or expectation that the individual will re-offend.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the matter must be remanded so that the trial court can consider * * * a current psychological assessment of Abelt at State's expense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.