144 Ohio App. 3d 179 - State v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably 147 Ohio App. 3d 116 - State v. Cooper (2002), 154 Ohio App. 3d 133 - State v. Ritze (2003)
53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Adams · Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · State v. Sage · In re Martin-Trigona · State v. Williford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, of confusion of the issues, or of misleading the jury.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he evidence must cause unfair prejudice, for if the term `unfair prejudice' simply meant prejudicial or unfavorable, anything adverse to a litigant's case would be excluded under Evid.R. 403.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]f the evidence arouses the jury's emotional sympathies, evokes a sense of horror, or appeals to an instinct to punish, the evidence may - 15 - Butler CA2021-12-158 be unfairly prejudicial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.