Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 Ohio App. 3d 301 - Jackson v. McDonald

144 Ohio App. 3d 301 - Jackson v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Chesher v. Neyer (2007), Schoenfield v. Navarre (2005)

3 federal appellate · 60 state decisions

280200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc. · Vahila v. Hall · Thompson v. McNeill · Hawkins v. Ivy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “dishonest purpose, moral obliquity, conscious wrongdoing, breach of a known duty through some ulterior motive or ill will partaking of the nature of fraud.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`if he does an act or intentionally fails to do an act which it is his duty to the other to do, knowing or having reason to know of facts which would lead a reasonable man to realize, not only that his conduct creates an unreasonable risk of physical harm to another, but also that such risk is substantially greater than that which is necessary to make his conduct negligent.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “it is only where the acts of the state employees are motivated by actual malice or other situations giving rise to punitive damages that their conduct may be outside the scope of their state employment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.