144 Ohio App. 3d 323 - State v. Grider’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Cook · State v. Edmonson · State v. Eppinger · 142 Ohio App. 3d 593 - State v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court shall impose a sentence and shall make a finding that gives its reasons for selecting the sentence imposed in any of the following circumstances: {¶ 13} * * {¶ 14} "(c) If it imposes consecutive sentences under section 2929.14 of the Revised Code, its reasons for imposing the consecutive sentences; {¶ 15} * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it has been held that merely reciting or tracking the statutory language in R.C. 2929.14 is not sufficient to comply with the mandate set forth in R.C. 2929.19 (B)(2)(c) to provide a reason for the consecutive sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.