Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 Ohio App. 3d 539 - State v. Evans

144 Ohio App. 3d 539 - State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
5
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably State v. Swanigan (2005), Welch v. Commonwealth (2004)

38 state decisions

240200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Ornelas v. United States · Gault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the age, mentality, and prior criminal experience of the accused; the length, intensity and frequency of interrogation; and the existence of physical deprivation or inducement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`whether a defendant's will was overborne' by the circumstances surrounding the giving of a confession. * * * [taking] into consideration `the totality of all the surrounding circumstances — both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[h]ad Evans failed to participate, he could have been found in violation of the court order that he do so, and he would have risked transfer to a far more restrictive facility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.