Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 Ohio App. 3d 565 - State v. Hollander

144 Ohio App. 3d 565 - State v. Hollander’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

41 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 33 Ohio App. 3d 342 - State v. Yontz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * The court imposing a sentence upon an offender for a felony may impose the longest prison term authorized for the offense pursuant to division (A) of this section only upon offenders who committed the worst form of the offense, upon offenders who pose the greatest likelihood of committing future crimes, upon certain major drug offenders under division (D)(3) of this section, and upon certain repeat violent offenders in accordance with division (D)(2) of this section.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “make a finding that gives its reasons for selecting the sentence imposed[.]”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) The offender committed the multiple offenses while the offender was awaiting trial or sentencing, was under a sanction imposed pursuant to section 2929.16 , 2929.17 , or 2929.18 of the Revised Code, or was under post-release control for a prior offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.