144 Ohio App. 3d 648 - State v. Luckett’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'[a] more searching inquiry is required' if the new trial is granted than if denied * * * because of 'the concern that a judge's nullification of the jury's verdict may encroach on the jury's important fact-finding function.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion) · State v. Dixon

2. “To warrant the granting of a new trial, the new evidence must, at the very least, disclose a strong probability that it will change the result if a new trial is granted.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Holmes, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2006) · State v. Cleveland, 08ca009406 (2-2-2009)

3. “A new trial may be granted on motion of the defendant”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Cleveland, 08ca009406 (2-2-2009) · State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)