144 Ohio App. 3d 69 - State v. Gilden’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · Melissa E. Debenedetto, a Minor by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Frances Debenedetto v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation, Deborah Samluk Drier v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation · Commonwealth v. Britto · 100 Ohio App. 345 - State v. Sheppard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“questioning by jurors is so inherently prejudicial that it should not occur under any circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“can undermine the attorney's strategy or theory of the case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.