Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1944-12-27
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1984
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1
dissenting. The defendant in this case was so patently guilty of the horrible crime with which he was charged that the error discussed, if it was really error, becomes insignificant. Section 13449-5, General Code, should be applied and the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Weygandt, C. J., and Turner, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.