144 So. 3d 1078 - State v. Landry’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Masino · State v. Gerstenberger · 708 So. 2d 401 - State v. Byrd · 312 So. 2d 282 - State v. Rembert · 362 So. 2d 570 - State v. Legendre
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the district court accepts as true the facts contained in the indictment or bill of information and in the bill of particulars, and determines as a matter of law and from the face of the pleadings, whether a crime has been charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ferguson“[F]actual defenses going to the merits of the charge are not proper grounds to be considered when deciding a motion to quash.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ferguson“the trial court is not authorized to make any factual determinations;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sparks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.