State v. Passaniti’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. · 922 So. 2d 517 - State v. Pigford · State v. Mims · 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Criminal conspiracy is the agreement or combination of two or more persons for the specific purpose of committing any crime; provided that an agreement or combination to commit a crime shall not amount to a criminal conspiracy unless, in addition to such agreement or combination, one or more of | Ssuch parties does an act in furtherance of the object of the agreement or combination. B. If the intended basic crime has been consummated, the conspirators may be tried for either the conspiracy or the completed offense, and a conviction for one shall not bar prosecution for the other.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.