Cermesoni v. Maneiro’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1781
Relies on Mann Manufacturing, Inc. v. Hortex, Inc. · 544 So. 2d 1018 - Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Development Corp. · 664 So. 2d 242 - State v. Eversole · Nahar v. Nahar · 570 So. 2d 996 - Cardenas v. Solis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a court is confronted with an action that would involve it in a serious interference with or usurpation of this continuing power, ‘considerations of comity and orderly administration of. justice demand that the nonrendering court should decline jurisdiction * * * and remand the parties for their relief to the rendering court, so long as it is apparent that a remedy is available there.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.