¶1ORDER
¶2Ronald Loenneke appeals the trial court’s judgment regarding child support. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been provided a *907memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).