Liebenroth v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis
144 U.S. 35 · 1892
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Arthur's Executors v. Butterfield · Arthur v. Fox · Hartranft v. Meyer · Mason v. Robertson · John Stuart Joseph Stuart James Stuart and William Scott v. Hugh Maxwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“on all articles manufactured from two or more materials the duty shall be assessed at the highest rates of which the component material of chief value may be chargeable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“paper; manufactures of, or of which paper is a component material, not specially enumerated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“manufactures and articles of leather, or of which leather shall be a component part,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.