Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 U.S. 451 - Dodge v. Tulleys

Dodge v. Tulleys’s Empirical Analysis

144 U.S. 451 · 1892

Citation profile

154
cited by 154 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 154 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2013 · most notably Sprage v. Ticonic Nat Bank (1939), Navarro Savings Assn. v. Lee (1980)

70 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

2401892190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trustees v. Greenough · Central Railroad Banking Co of Georgia v. Pettus · Holland v. Challen · Ackley School District v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 154 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is tlie general rule of equity that a trustee called upon to discharge any duties in the administering of his trust Is entitled to compensation therefor, and included therein is a reasonable allowance for counsel fees. This is constantly enforced in the federal courts in the various railroad foreclosures that have been and are proceeding therein; and this irrespective of any state legislation. The subject was exhaustively considered1 by Mr. Justice Bradley, in the case of Trustees v. Greenough, 105 U. S. 527 [ 26 L. Ed. 1157 ]. The English and American authorities were fully reviewed, and the power and duty of the court to make reasonable allowances (including counsel fees) to trustees or others acting in that capacity was affirmed.” Dodge v. Tulleys, 144 U. S. 451 , 457, 12 Sup. Ct. 728 , 731 ( 36 L. Ed. 501 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.