Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 U.S. 677 - United States v. Eaton

United States v. Eaton’s Empirical Analysis

144 U.S. 677 · 1892

Citation profile

412
cited by 412 later decisions
49
cited 49 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

147 federal appellate · 88 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 412 later decisions (49 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Krulewitch v. United States (1949), United States v. Grimaud (1911)

147 federal appellate · 88 district · 34 state decisions — followed in 13 states

83018921900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Hudson · Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes · Smith v. Whitney · Manchester v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 412 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a principle of criminal law that an offense which may be the subject of criminal procedure is an act committed or omitted ‘in violation of a public law either forbidding or commanding it.’ ””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a criminal offense in a citizen, where a statute does not distinctly make the neglect in question a criminal offense.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if a party shall knowingly, or wil-fully, omit, neglect, or refuse to do, or cause to be done, any of the things required by law in the carrying on or conducting of his business, or shall do anything by this act prohibited, ... he shall pay a penalty,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.