Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 Vt. 31 - Stratton v. Steele

Stratton v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2017

20 state decisions

601984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Revere Copper and Brass Incorporated v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Third-Party v. George A. Fuller Company, Inc., Third-Party · Stevenson Co Inc v. Bags of Flour Adm Milling Co Inc · Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Lake Shore Land Co. · Mercantile Trust Company National Association v. Inland Marine Products Corporation, Andstoller Fisheries, Inc. v. Gulf Tex Brokerage, Inc. · Imperial Enterprises, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any oppos ing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[A] claim has a logical relationship to the original claim if it arises out of the same aggregate of operative facts as the original claim in two senses: (1) that the same aggregate of operative facts serves as the basis of both claims; or (2) that the aggregate core of facts upon which the original claim rests activates additional legal rights in a party defendant that would otherwise remain dormant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there are limits to the liberal application of these rules; motions to amend may be denied if they have been unreasonably delayed, causing prejudice to the opposing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.