State v. Condrick’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably State v. JS (2002), In Re PS (1997)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hashimi v. Kalil · In Re John Ballay, A/K/A Figeret Hoxha, Patient · State v. Lodge · Proctor v. Butler · 59 Ill. App. 3d 500 - People v. Garcia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person who is suffering from mental illness and, as a result of that mental illness, his capacity to exercise self-control, judgment or discretion in the conduct of his affairs and social relations is so lessened that he poses a danger of harm to himself or others; (A) A danger of harm to others may be shown by establishing that: (i) he has inflicted or attempted to inflict bodily harm on another; or (ii) by his threats or actions he has placed others in reasonable fear of physical harm to themselves; or (iii) by his actions or inactions he has presented a danger to persons in his care.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. JS · State v. J.S.“[A] case is not moot when negative collateral consequences are likely to result from the action being reviewed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“this finding is not required in the commitment procedures at hand but is a requirement, rather, of the civil commitment procedures under Title 18.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. JS
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.