144 Wash. 2d 236 - State v. Stein’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
40 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · William Marbury v. James Madison · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · Love v. United States · 117 Wash. 2d 829 - State v. Lord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`practical and identifiable consequences in the trial of the case.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kronich · State v. Ridgley“(1) A person is guilty of a crime if it is committed by the conduct of another person for which he is legally accountable. (2) A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another person when: . . . (c) He is an accomplice of such other person in the commission of the crime. (3) A person is an accomplice of another person in the commission of a crime if: (a) With knowledge that it will promote or facilitate the commission of the crime, he (i) solicits, commands, encourages, or requests such other person to commit it; or (ii) aids or agrees to aid such other person in planning or committing it; or (b) His conduct is expressly declared by law to establish his complicity.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stein · State v. Mangan“[i]nstructional error is presumed to be prejudicial unless is affirmatively appears to be harmless,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.