Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 WIS 439 - Cline v. Whitaker

Cline v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010

16 state decisions

5019111920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harrigan v. Gilchrist · State ex rel. Rose v. Superior Court of Milwaukee County · State ex rel. Flower v. Circuit Court for Green Lake County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In dealing with such a matter as this the distinction between total want of jurisdiction; absolute absence of power, and want of jurisdiction, in the sense the term is commonly used, characterizing judicial action which is so highly erroneous as to be without legal justification, yet not, as has been said, beyond competency to err, — must be kept in mind. The two phases of jurisdiction were discussed at considerable length in Harrigan v. Gilchrist, 121 Wis. 127 , 99 N. W. 909 , one being termed want of power and the other inexcusable departure from established principles; — a gross misuse of power. The former is a usurpation. The resulting judgment or order is totally void. The latter is mere error. The resulting judgment is valid, till avoided in proceedings to that end.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.