144 Wis. 2d 810 - State v. Hatch’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · United States v. Hayman · Geders v. United States · Abujasen v. United States · California v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he defendant [was] peculiarly situated to assist in trying such a motion because he . . . participated in the events as to which”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“substantial issues of fact as to events in which [he had] participated,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.