Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 AD2D 208 - In re Karp

In re Karp’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
October 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2012

4 federal appellate ·

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 2001 (Excise, Estate, and Gift Tax Adjustment Act of 1970) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “hard and fast rule that reconstructed time records can never serve as a basis for compensation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.