¶1— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with the hearing court that the complainant had ample opportunity to observe the defendant and thus had an independent basis for his identification, untainted by any suggestive identification at a showup (see, People v Ramos, 42 NY2d 834; People v Koberstein, 103 AD2d 1021, affd 66 NY2d 989). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — robbery, second degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
145 A.D.2d 937
People v. Walker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 1988
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1988-12-23
Decided 1988-12-23