People v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“alleged that Cox raped her and orally and anally sodomized her at her home on the evening of February 14, 2009. After a non-jury trial, the court found Cox guilty of the two counts of first-degree criminal sexual act, but not guilty of first-degree rape. On appeal, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, held that the third count, charging Cox with engaging in anal sexual contact with the victim by forcible compulsion, was rendered duplicitous by H.B.'s testimony. The court stated that because she testified that the acts of anal sexual contact occurred”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“re-present[ing] any appropriate charges under that count of the indictment to another grand jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“such acts did not constitute a continuous offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.