State v. Pleasant’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Reese
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Upon a defendant’s conviction for an offense causing economic loss to any person, the court, in its sole discretion, may order that all or any portion of the fine imposed be allocated as restitution to be paid by the defendant to any person who suffered an economic loss caused by the defendant’s conduct. B. In ordering restitution for economic loss pursuant to § 13-603, subsection C or subsection A of this section, the court shall consider all losses caused by the criminal offense or offenses for which the defendant has been convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Proctor“only for an offense that he has admitted, upon which he has been found guilty, or upon which he has agreed to pay restitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. French
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.