Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Ariz. 439 - State v. Grooms

State v. Grooms’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561 · State v. Donahue · 18 Ariz. App. 499 - LeRoy v. Odgers · State v. Kerekes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits custodial interference if, knowing or having reason to know that he has no legal right to do so, such person knowingly takes, entices or keeps from lawful custody any child less than eighteen years of age or incompetent, entrusted by authority of law to the custody of another person or institution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Custodial interference is a class 6 felony unless the person taken from custody is returned voluntarily by the defendant without physical injury prior to arrest in which case it is a class 1 misdemeanor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.