145 Cal. App. 4th 170 - Charnay v. Cobert’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
35 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 44 Cal. 3d 1103 - Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co. · 6 Cal. 3d 176 - Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand · 2 Cal. 4th 962 - Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital District · 12 Cal. 4th 631 - Lazar v. Superior Court · 3 Cal. 4th 370 - Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`so unreasonable as to show imposition or undue advantage'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] contractually shortened limitations period has never been recognized outside the context of. straightforward transactions in which the .triggering event for either a breach of contract or for the accrual of a right is immediate and .obvious. Moreover, no decision upholding the validity of a contractually .shortened limitation period has done so in the context of an action against a professional or skilled expert where breach of duty is more difficult to detect. Instead, most reported decisions upholding shortened periods involve straightforward commercial contracts plus the unambiguous breaches or accrual of rights under those contracts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' "how, when, where, to whom, and by what means the representations were tendered”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.