Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Colo. 202 - People v. Albrecht

People v. Albrecht’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2004

15 state decisions

5019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Carolene Products Co. · Nashville St Ry v. Walters · Oklahoma Operating Co. v. Love · Municipal Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission · People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Barksdale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is axiomatic that a defendant in a trial on a criminal charge, can always be heard to advocate, and introduce evidence to support, the defense and justification claimed for the alleged unlawful acts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.