Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

145 F. 1023

Docket Nos. 61, 62.

Ward v. Ward

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1906.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1906-05-22

<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1907

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ward v. Ward

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1906-05-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Austen G. Fox, for appellants.

¶3Wm. G. Wilson, for appellees.

¶4Before WALLACE and TOWNSEND, Circuit Judges. HOLT, District Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6A majority of the court, after a careful examination of the record, have reached the conclusion that the decrees below ought not to be disturbed, and concur in the views expressed in the opinion of the court below. The decrees are accordingly affirmed with costs. For opinion below, see 131 Fed. 946.

/145/f1d/1023 · .json · Public domain