The Flushing’s Empirical Analysis
145 F. 614 · 1906
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1962
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on The Flushing
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) That there was a breach oí the express warranty that the tug should at all times during the continuance of the policy be well found in anchors as is usual and customary, and that said Tug had been adjudged liable for failure to provide and furnish an anchor of sufficient size for the requirements of her tow. (2) That tiie injuries to the canal boats for which the tug has been adjudged liable were not caused or incurred while said canal boats or either of them were in tow of said Tug, either alongside or at the end of a hawser.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.