In re McCall’s Empirical Analysis
145 F. 898 · 1906
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1930
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Claassen v. United States · Spies v. Illinois · Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings · District of Columbia v. Woodbury · Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No appeal or writ of error by which any order, judgment, or decree may ’be reviewed in the Circuit Court of Appeals under the provisions of this Act shall be taken or sued out, except within six months after the entry, of the order, judgment, or decree sought to be reviewed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.