Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 F.2d 16 - Fleish v. Johnston

Fleish v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

145 F.2d 16 · 1944

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
December 1972
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1972

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

601944195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Ebeling v. Morgan · McKee v. Johnston · 100 Cal. App. 559 - People v. Puppilo · Crapo v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) Persons in general. Every person possessing a firearm shall register, with the collector of the district in which he resides, the number or other mark identifying such firearm, together with his name, address, place where such firearm is usually kept, and place of business or employment, and, if such person is other than a natural person, the name and home address of an executive officer thereof: * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Any person who violates or fails to comply with any of the requirements of this subchapter and Part VIII of subchapter A of chapter 27 shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $2,000 or be imprisoned for not more than five years, or both, in the discretion of the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.