Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

145 F.2d 233

Docket No. 10891.

Batten v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 11, 1944.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1944-10-11

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1970

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1944-10-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1George Stahlman and James B. Salem, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Charles H. Carr, U. S. Atty., and James M. Carter and Ernest A. Tolin, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal, for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5On consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this Court in this cause issue forthwith.

/145/f2d/233 · .json · Public domain