Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

145 F.2d 235

Docket No. 10727.

Haley v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 26, 1944.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1944-10-26

2 counsel of record

Relies on 46 F. Supp. 4 - Haley v. United States

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1944-10-26

¶1John W. Mahan and C E. Pew, both of Helena, Mont., for appellant.

¶2Lester P. Schoene, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, I). C., Francis M. Shea, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., Wilbur C. Pickett and Fendall Marbury, Attys., Dept, of Justice, both of Washington, D. C., John B. Tansil, U. S. Atty., of Billings, Mont., and Francis J. McGan, Sp. Atty., Department of Justice, of Butte, Mont., for appellee.

¶3Before GARRECHT and MATLIEWS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties from which it appears that a compromise has been *236agreed upon and accepted on behalf of the appellee by direction of the Attorney General, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court in this cause, 46 F.Supp. 4, be and hereby is vacated, and that this cause be and hereby is remanded to the District Court for entry of a new judgment upon the compromise agreement pursuant t-o the provisions of c. 101, 48 Stat. 302, as amended by c. 34, 52 Stat. 81, 38 U.S.C. § 445b.

/145/f2d/235 · .json · Public domain